Breadcrumbs

Title page || Publications

2020

DEVROE, Robin, Samuel SPÁČ and Matej UHLÍK. 2020. Does the Context Matter for the Prevalence of Political Gender Stereotypes? An Experimental Study in Flanders (Belgium) and Slovakia. Representation, Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 13–30.

KOSAŘ, David and Adam BLISA. 2020. Scope and Intensity of Judicial Review: Which Power for Judges within the Control of Immigration Detention?. In Law and Judicial Dialogue on the Return of Irregular Migrants from the European Union, edited by Madalina Bianca Moraru, Galina Cornelisse and Philippe De Bruycker. Hart Publishing.

KOSAŘ, David, Jan PETROV, Katarína ŠIPULOVÁ, Hubert SMEKAL, Ladislav VYHNÁNEK and Jozef JANOVSKÝ. 2020. Domestic Judicial Treatment of European Court of Human Rights – Beyond Compliance. Routledge. BeCOM

KOSAŘ, David and Katarína ŠIPULOVÁ. 2020. Court-packing, aneb jak obsadit soudy svými lidmi [Court-Packing]. In Nezávislost soudní moci [Judicial Independence], edited by Vojtěch Šimíček, pp. 77–112. Prague: Leges.

KOSAŘ, David and Ladislav VYHNÁNEK. 2020. The Constitutional Court of Czechia. In The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law, Vol. III: Constitutional Adjudication: Institutions, edited by Admin von Bogdandy, Peter Huber and Christoph Grabenwarter, pp. 119–179. Oxford University Press.

MORARU, Madalina, Galina CORNELISSE and Philippe DE BRUYCKER (eds.). 2020. Law and Judicial Dialogue on the Return of Irregular Migrants from the European Union. Hart Publishing.

MORARU, Madalina. 2020. Judicial Dialogue on the Return Directive: Catalyst for Changing Migration Governance?. In Law and Judicial Dialogue on the Return of Irregular Migrants from the European Union, edited by Madalina Moraru, Galina Cornelisse and Philippe de Bruycker. Hart Publishing.

MORARU, Madalina. 2020. Judicial dialogue in action: Making sense of the risk of absconding  in return proceedings. In Law and Judicial Dialogue on the Return of Irregular Migrants from the European Union, edited by Madalina Moraru, Galina Cornelisse and Philippe de Bruycker. Hart Publishing.

MORARU, Madalina and Felicia NICA. 2020. A practical evaluation of border activities in Romania: control, surveillance, and expulsions. In Fundamental Rights Challenges in Border Controls and Expulsion of Irregular Immigrants in the European Union: Complaint Mechanisms and Access to Justice, edited by Sergio Carrera and Marco Stefan. Abingdon and New York, NY: Routledge.

NÍ GHRÁINNE, Bríd. 2020. Safe Zones and the Internal Protection Alternative. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 69, No. 2, pp. 335–364.

ŠIPULOVÁ, Katarína and Monika HANYCH. 2020. Ukradená intimita: sexuální obtěžování v online prostoru. In Mužské právo. Jsou právní pravidla neutrální? [Men’s Law: Are Legal Rules Neutral?], edited by Barbara Havelková, Pavla Špondrová and Kateřina Šimáčková. Prague: Wolters Kluwer.

SPÁČ, Samuel. 2020. Informal judicial networks and  judicial independence in the aftermath of Ján Kuciak’s murder. V4 Human Rights Review, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 40–42.

2019

HAMŘÍK, Lukáš and Petr KANIOK. 2019. Is it all about European Democracy? The Motives behind the Institutionalisation of the Spitzenkandidaten. Journal of Contemporary European Research, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 354–377.

KADLEC, Ondřej. 2019. Role velkých senátů v rozhodování českých vrcholných soudů [The Role of Grand Chambers in the Decision-Making of Czech Apex Courts]. Prague: Wolters Kluwer.

KOSAŘ, David, Jiří BAROŠ and Pavel DUFEK. 2019. The Twin Challenges to Separation of Powers in Central Europe: Technocratic Governance and Populism. European Constitutional Law Review, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 427–461. JUDI-ARCH

KOSAŘ, David and Jan PETROV. 2019. The Domestic Judiciary in the Architecture of the Strasbourg System of Human Rights. In How International Law Works in Times of Crisis, edited by George Ulrich and Ineta Ziemele, pp. 255–271. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

KOSAŘ, David and Ladislav VYHNÁNEK. 2019. Constitutional Identity in the Czech Republic: A New Twist on the Old Fashioned Idea? In Constitutional identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism, edited by Christian Calliess and Gerhard van der Schyff, pp. 85–113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

KÜHN, Zdeněk, Tomáš KOCOUREK, Petr MIKEŠ and Ondřej KADLEC et al. 2019. Soudní řád správní. Komentář [The Code of Administrative Procedure. Commentary]. Prague: Wolters Kluwer.

MORARU, Madalina. 2019. An Analysis Of The Consular Protection Directive: Are EU Citizens Now Better Protected In The World? Common Market Law Review, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 417–461.

NÍ GHRÁINNE, Bríd. 2019. Internally Displaced Persons and International Refugee Law. In Elgar Research Handbook on Refugee Law, edited by Satvinder Singh Juss, pp. 31–43. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.

NÍ GHRÁINNE, Bríd and MCMAHON, Aisling. 2019. Abortion in Northern Ireland and the European Convention on Human Rights: Reflections from the UK Supreme Court. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 68, No. 2, pp. 477–494.

NÍ GHRÁINNE, Bríd and Aisling MCMAHON. 2019. Access to Abortion in cases of Fatal Fetal Abnormality: A New Direction for the European Court of Human Rights?. Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 561–584.

NÍ GHRÁINNE, Bríd and MCMAHON, Aisling. 2019. After the Eighth: Ireland, Abortion and International Law. Medico-Legal Journal of Ireland, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 22–40.

PETROV, Jan. 2019. Vnitrostátní soudy a způsoby argumentace judikaturou ESLP [Domestic courts and methods of argumentation with the ECtHR’s case law]. Právník, Vol. 158, No. 2, pp. 163–181.

ŠIPULOVÁ, Katarína. 2019. The Czech Constitutional Court: Far away from political influence. In Constitutional Politics and the Judiciary Decision-making in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by Kálmán Pócza, pp. 32–60. Abingdon and New York, NY: Routledge.

ŠIPULOVÁ, Katarína. 2019. ECtHR – Ally, Adversary, or Foe? The Attitudes of Judges Towards International Human Rights Law in the (Post-) Transitioning Area. Jahrbuch für Ostrecht, No. 1, pp. 235–252.

URBÁNIKOVÁ, Marína. 2019. Being LGBT+ in the Czech Republic: Experience with Prejudice, Discrimination, and Violence. V4 Human Rights Review, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 10–12.

2018

BENVENUTI, Simone. 2018. Politics of judicial accountability in Italy. Shifting the balance. European Constitutional Law Review, Vol. 14, Issue 2, pp. 369-396. JUDI-ARCH

BENVENUTI, Simone and Davide PARIS. 2018. Judicial Self-Government in Italy: Merits, Limits and the Reality of an Export Model. German Law Journal, Vol. 19, No. 7, pp. 1641–1670. JUDI-ARCH

BLISA, Adam. 2018. „Stará“ a „nová“ dělba moci: nový pohled na starý koncept [„Old“ and „New“ Separation of Powers: a New Look at the Old Concept]. Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi [Journal of Jurisprudence and Legal Practice], Vol. 26, No. 3, pp.547–556.

BLISA, Adam and David KOSAŘ. 2018. Court Presidents: The Missing Piece in the Puzzle of Judicial Governance. German Law Journal, Vol. 19, No. 7, pp. 2031–2076. JUDI-ARCH

BLISA, Adam, Tereza  PAPOUŠKOVÁ and Marína URBÁNIKOVÁ. 2018. Judicial Self-Government in Czechia: Europe’s Black Sheep? German Law Journal, Vol. 19, No. 7, pp. 1951–1976. JUDI-ARCH

KOSAŘ, David. 2018. Beyond Judicial Councils: Forms, Rationales and Impact of Judicial Self Governance in Europe. German Law Journal, Vol. 19, No. 7, pp. 1567–1612. JUDI-ARCH

KOSAŘ, David. 2018. The Strasbourg Court and Domestic Judicial Politics. In International Courts and Domestic Politics, edited by Marlene Wind, pp. 71-92. Cambridge: Cambridge Unviersity Press.

KOSAŘ, David. 2018. The CJEU Has Spoken Out, But the Show Must Go On. Verfassungsblog, August 2, 2018. Available online at:https://verfassungsblog.de/the-cjeu-has-spoken-out-but-the-show-must-go-on/.

KOSAŘ, David and Jan PETROV. 2018. Determinants of Compliance Difficulties among 'Good Compliers': Implementation of International Human Rights Rulings in the Czech Republic. European Journal of International Law, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 397-425.

KOSAŘ, David, and Katarína ŠIPULOVÁ. 2018. The Strasbourg Court Meets Abusive Constitutionalism: Baka v. Hungary and the Rule of Law. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 83-110. JUDI-ARCH

KOSAŘ, David and Ladislav VYHNÁNEK. 2018. Ústavní identita České republiky [The Constitutional Identity of the Czech Republic]. Právník [Lawyer], Vol. 157, No. 10, pp. 854–872.

KOSAŘ, David and Samuel SPÁČ. 2018. Conceptualization(s) of Judicial Independence and Judicial Accountability by the European Network of Councils for the Judiciary: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back. International Journal for Court Administration, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 37–46.

NÍ GHRÁINNE, Bríd and Aisling McMahon. 2018. Ireland’s 8th amendment is a breach of its own human rights commitments. The Conversation, May 24, 2018. Available online at: http://theconversation.com/irelands-8th-amendment-is-a-breach-of-its-own-human-rights-commitments-97013.

NÍ GHRÁINNE, Bríd and Aisling McMahon. 2018. Ireland is likely to liberalise abortion laws. Oxford Analytica Daily Brief, May 3, 2018. Available online at: https://dailybrief.oxan.com/Analysis/DB233534/Ireland-is-likely-to-liberalise-abortion-laws.

PAPOUŠKOVÁ, Tereza. 2018. Advokáti před Ústavním soudem: za jakých okolností se na něj obrací? [Lawyers before the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic: Under What They Petition It?] Jurisprudence, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 28-41.

PAPOUŠKOVÁ, Tereza. 2018. Nastolování agendy u Ústavního soudu: kdo a na základě čeho vybírá, které případy projednat a které odmítnout? [Agenda Setting at the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic: who decides and how which cases are decided on merit] Jurisprudence, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 3-21.

PETROV, Jan. 2018. Unpacking the partnership: typology of constitutional courts’ roles in implementation of the European Court of Human Rights’ case law. European Constitutional Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 499–531. JUDI-ARCH

SMEKAL, Hubert and Ladislav VYHNÁNEK et al. 2018. Beyond Compliance – Implementace rozhodnutí mezinárodních lidskoprávních těles na národní úrovni [Beyond Compliance – Implementation of International Human Rights Case Law]. Prague: Wolters Kluwer. BeCOM

ŠIPULOVÁ, Katarína. 2018. The Czech Constitutional Court: Far away from political influence. In Constitutional Politics and the Judiciary: Decision-making in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by Kálmán Pócza. Abingdon and New York, NY: Routledge.

ŠIPULOVÁ, Katarína, Jozef JANOVSKÝ and Hubert SMEKAL. 2018. Ideology and International Human Rights Commitments in Post-Communist Regimes: The Cases of the Czech Republic and Slovakia. In International Courts and Domestic Politics, edited by Marlene Wind, pp. 181-205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

ŠIPULOVÁ, Katarína, Hubert SMEKAL and Jozef JANOVSKÝ. 2018. Searching for A Reference: Using Automated Text Analysis to Study Judicial Compliance. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 131–160.

SPÁČ, Samuel. 2018. Recruiting European Judges in the Age of Judicial Self-Government. German Law Journal, Vol. 19, No. 7, pp. 2077–2104. JUDI-ARCH

SPÁČ, Samuel, Katarína ŠIPULOVÁ and Marína URBÁNIKOVÁ. 2018. Capturing the Judiciary from Inside: The Story of Judicial Self-Governance in Slovakia. German Law Journal, Vol. 19, No. 7, pp. 1741–1768. JUDI-ARCH

TSERETELI, Nino. 2018. Quality Control in the Preliminary Examination of the Georgia Situation. In Quality Control in Preliminary Examination: Volume 1, edited by Morten Bergsmo a Carsten Stahn, pp. 521-554. Brussels: Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher.

TSERETELI, Nino and Hubert SMEKAL. 2018. The Judicial Self-Government at the International Level – A New Research Agenda. German Law Journal, Vol. 19, No. 7, pp. 2137–2164. JUDI-ARCH

URBÁNIKOVÁ, Marína and Katarína ŠIPULOVÁ. 2018. Failed Expectations: Does the Establishment of Judicial Councils Enhance Confidence in Courts? German Law Journal, Vol. 19, No. 7, pp. 2105–2136. JUDI-ARCH

2017

KOSAŘ, David and Samuel SPÁČ. 2017. Predsedovia súdov: od ministerských ''spojok'' k autonómnym aktérom [Court Presidents: From the Ministerial ''Transmission Belts'' to Autonomous Actors[. In Nedotknuteľní? Politika sudcovských kariét na Slovensku v rokoch 1993-2015 [The Untouchables? The Politics of Judicial Careers in Slovakia in 1993-2015], edited by Erik Láštic and Samuel Spáč, pp. 130-153. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského.

KADLEC, Ondřej and Jan PETROV. 2017. Rozšířený senát NSS: Judikatura ESLP jako zákaz vjezdu na křižovatce právních názorů [The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Administrative Court: ECtHR’s case law as a no-entry sign at the crossroads of legal solutions]. Soudní rozhledy, Vol. 2017, No. 1, pp. 2-7. BeCom

KOSAŘ, David. 2017. Judicializace justiční politiky Evropským soudem pro lidská práva [Judicialization of Judicial Politics by the European Court of Human Rights]. Prague: Wolters Kluwer, 2017.

KOSAŘ, David. 2017. Nudging Domestic Judicial Reforms from Strasbourg: How the European Court of Human Rights shapes domestic judicial design. Utrecht Law Review, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 112-123.

KOSAŘ, David. 2017. Politics of Judicial Independence and Judicial Accountability in Czechia: Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law between Court Presidents and the Ministry of Justice. European Constitutional Law Review, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 96-123. JUDI-ARCH

KOSAŘ, David and Jan PETROV. 2017. The Architecture of the Strasbourg System of Human Rights: The Crucial Role of the Domestic Level and the Constitutional Courts in Particular. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Vol. 77, No. 3, pp. 585-621.

KOSAŘ, David and Tereza PAPOUŠKOVÁ. 2017. Přinesla „Pospíšilova“ reforma kárného řízení skutečně zpřísnění kárného postihu českých soudců? [Has "Pospíšil's" Reform of Disciplining Judges Really Led to Harsher Disciplinary Sanctions?]. Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 219-240.

KOSAŘ, David and Tereza PAPOUŠKOVÁ. 2017. Kárná odpovědnost soudce v přerodu: Ponaučení z České republiky [Judicial Discipline in Transition: Lessons from the Czech Republic]. Prague: Wolters Kluwer.

KOSAŘ, David, Filip KŘEPELKA and Ladislav VYHNÁNEK. 2017. Kompendium evropského ústavního práva [European Constitutional Law Handbook]. Brno: Masaryk University.

KRPEC, Oldřich, Petr OCELÍK and Hubert SMEKAL. 2017. Narrowing the Divide: Perspectives on the Future of Mixed Methods: Report from Central and Eastern Europe. The Journal of Mixed Methods Research, Vol. 11/2017, No. 1, pp. 11-14.

PAPOUŠKOVÁ, Tereza and Jan PAPOUŠEK. 2017. Advokáti před Ústavním soudem: zaručuje jejich zkušenost úspěch? [Lawyers before the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic: Does Experience Make Them More Successful]. Jurisprudence, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 12-24.

PAPOUŠKOVÁ, Tereza and Jan PAPOUŠEK. 2017. Ústavní soudci v kvantitativní perspektivě [Czech Constitutional Justices in the Quantitative Perspective]. Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 73-92.

ŠAMÁNEK, Jiří, Eva NEHUDKOVÁ, Petr POLÁK, Marína URBÁNIKOVÁ and Lucie OBROVSKÁ. 2017. Antidiskriminační právo v judikatuře a praxi [Antidiscrimination law in case law and practise]. Prague: C.H.Beck.

TSERETELI, Nino. 2017. The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Guiding and Facilitating Legislative Reforms In International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliamentsi, edited by Matthew Saul, Andreas Follesdal and Geir Ulfstein, pp. 223-247. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

URBÁNIKOVÁ, Marína and Hubert SMEKAL. 2017. Právní věda a právní psaní: postačí vždy jako výzkumná metoda "číst, přemýšlet a psát"? [Legal Science and Legal Writing: Does "Reading, Thinking, and Writing" always Suffice as a Research Method?]. Jurisprudence, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 37-41.

VYHNÁNEK, Ladislav. 2017. A Holistic View of the Czech Constitutional Court Approach to the ECtHR’s Case Law. Heidelberg Journal of International Law, Vol. 77, No. 3, pp. 715-744.

2016

BLISA, Adam. 2016. Odměňování soudců jako součást soudcovské nezávislosti [Judicial Remuneration as a Component of Judicial Independence]. Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 391-413.

FOLLESDAL, Andreas and Nino TSERETELI. 2016. The Margin of Appreciation in Europe and beyond. The International Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 20, No. 8, pp. 1055-1057.

HOLZER, Jan, Pavel MOLEK, Pavel DUFEK, Jiří BAROŠ, Michal MOCHŤAK, Ivo POSPÍŠIL, Petr PRECLÍK and Hubert SMEKAL. 2016. Demokratyzacja i prawa czlowieka. Spojrzenie z Europy Srodkowej [Democratization and Human Rights. Views from Central Europe]. Krakow and Brno: Osrodek Mysli Politycznej – Masaryk University.

KADLEC, Ondřej and Jan PETROV. 2016. Rozšířený senát NSS: Judikatura ESLP jako zákaz vjezdu na křižovatce právních názorů [The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Administrative Court: ECtHR’s case law as a no-entry sign at the crossroads of legal solutions]. MUNI LAW Working Papers, Vol. 2016, No. 4, pp. 1-12.

KILIAN, Petr, Ivo POSPÍŠIL a Hubert SMEKAL. 2016. International Human Rights in Czech Legal Education. International and Comparative Law Review, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 87-98. 

KOSAŘ, David and Jan PETROV. 2016. Jak vybrat „případy“ do případové studie a pracovat s nimi v právu: poznatky z výzkumu na pomezí práva a politologie [How to select and develop case studies in law: Insights from law and politics research]. Jurisprudence, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 21-30. BeCOM

PETROV, Jan. 2016. Senátoři a iniciace ústavního přezkumu zákonů [Senators and initiation of judicial review of legislation]. In Dvacet let Senátu Parlamentu České republiky v souvislostech [Twenty Years of the Senate of the Czech Republic in Context], edited by Jan Kysela, pp. 173-187. Prague: Leges.

SMEKAL, Hubert and Katarína ŠIPULOVÁ. 2016. Empirický právní výzkum [Empirical Legal Research]. Jurisprudence, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 31-38.

SMEKAL, Hubert and Katarína ŠIPULOVÁ. 2016. Výzkum lidských práv: Kritická reflexe současných přístupů [Research on Human Rights: Critical Reflection of Current Approaches]. Středoevropské politické studie, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 381-411.

SMEKAL, Hubert, Katarína ŠIPULOVÁ, Ivo POSPÍŠIL, Jozef JANOVSKÝ and Petr KILIAN. 2016. Making Sense of Human Rights Commitments: A Study of Two Emerging European Democracies. Brno: MUNI Press.

TSERETELI, Nino. 2016. Emerging Doctrine of Deference of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights? The International Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 20, No. 8, pp. 1097-1112.

TSERETELI, Nino. 2016. The Impact of the Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights on the Georgian Domestic Legal Order (in Georgian). In National and International Mechanisms of Human Rights Protection, edited by K. Korkelia, pp. 163-183.

 

 

 

 

 

 

A multilingual bibliography relevant for the JUDI-ARCH Project is available at: http://justin.law.muni.cz/dokumenty/48497. The bibliography includes vast majority of relevant academic literature and other sources (including official documents and newspaper articles) on the topic of judicial self-government. It covers all national jurisdictions studied within the WP1, two supranational ones, as well as more theoretical issues related to the judicial self-governance (e.g. selections of judges, public confidence in courts, motivations of judges, forms of judicial self-governance and their impact, etc.).


Webdesign: NETservis s.r.o. copyright © Masarykova univerzita 2016